|
CONTENTS ARTICLES
Doug
Ashwell abstract Robert
E. Bartholonew, Bryan Dickeson abstract Augie
Fleras abstract Roy Nash
abstract Andrew
P. Lynch abstract REVIEWS Ellen
J. Dannin S. Middleton
and H. May P. O'Brien
and R. Murray (eds) Andrew
D. Trlin and Paul Spoonley (eds) C.M.
Brennan ABSTRACTS Horses
and Hydro Lakes: Doug Ashwell Since the early 1970s public awareness and concern for environmental issues has increased. Many believe the media has been instrumental in raising the public's awareness. However, recent overseas research indicates that the media continue to use traditional methods of reporting, including the use of established 'primary definers'. Primary definers include groups such as government departments, recognised scientific bodies and large corporations which are favoured media courses for information on various issues. This has led the media to consider issues of the 'environment' only in terms of nuclear concerns, pollution and the conservation/ protection of endangered species. These issues are often framed in ways that are favourable to the 'primary definers' while limiting the reporting of alternative viewpoints. Using content analysis of two case studies, the following research shows that The Dominion, a leading New Zealand metropolitan daily newspaper, also privileges traditional 'primary definers' as their major sources of information on environmental issues with similar outcomes. The findings also show that for the issues examined in the media were guilty of 'shallow environmentalism'. The environmental content of the issues was only briefly reported and declined in importance to be replaced with issues that more easily met the criteria of more traditional news values. This approach, while increasing public awareness, does little to inform the public about the complexity of these issues nor does it help the public to make informed decisions about how problems may be resolved. Expanding
the Boundary of Moral Panics: Robert
E. Bartholomew This article examines an episode of collective delusion involving mass sightings of phantom German Zeppelins that transpired in New Zealand during 1909. The major indicators and theoretical perspective of moral panics will be outlined, followed by a description of the Zeppelin scare. While the incident does not meet the contemporary sociological consensus as to what criteria constitute a moral panic, the authors contend that the present definition of a moral panic should be expanded to include the Zeppelin scare and similar episodes.
This paper examines waves of claims and public discourse surrounding mass sightings of imaginary German Zeppelin-type dirigibles over New Zealand between July and September 1909, fostering widespread concern and fear among sections of the community. While the societal reaction to the sightings does not conform to the standard definition of a moral panic as defined by Cohen (1972), we argue that the present conceptualisation of what constitutes such panics is overly narrow and should be expanded to encompass such episodes. We begin by providing a brief overview of the major indicators and theoretical orientations of moral panics, followed by the narrative describing the 1909 Zeppelin sightings and conclude with an analysis of this chain of events from the moral panic perspective. Working
Through Differences: Augie
Fleras Pressure
is mounting in Aotearoa New Zealand to formalise multiculturalism as a
counterweight to 'biculturalism' for working through differences in a
changing and increasingly diverse society. This paper proposes to problematise
the debate over diversity by refracting the politics of 'isms' through
the prism of multiculturalism as discourse and practice. The paper argues
that official multiculturalism is not intended to celebrate differences
or promote diversity. Envisaged instead is a reconstituted society in
which diversity is incorporated through institutional accommodation as
legitimate and integral, without undermining either the interconnectedness
of the parts that secured the whole or the distinctiveness of the constituent
diversities. The paper also argues that the subsequent de-politicization
of diversity under official multiculturalism has had the effect of isolating
Canada's 'consensus' multiculturalism from the 'insurgent' discourses
that animate 'critical' multiculturalisms in the United States. Insofar
as critical multiculturalisms invoke challenges whereas consensus multiculturalism
invites accommodation, it would appear New Zealanders may confront an
array of models for engaging with diversity, but not without carefully
weighing its 'post-bicultural' options. In that New Zealand's biculturalism
is tantamount to a 'multiculturalism for Maori', a bi-nationalist alternative
is proposed that simultaneously transcends yet enhances the salience of
multiculturalism either as 'consensus' or 'resistance'. The paper concludes
by exploring the implications of 'ism' politics against the backdrop of
Aotearoa's post-colonising efforts at promoting a dual arrangement that
constructively engages an official multiculturalism within a bi-national
framework. Radical
Structuralismin the Sociology of Education: Roy
Nash This is one of a series of publications in which 'qualitative' data is interrogated in the context of a theoretical conversation. The aim of the project is to further the development of realist approaches in the sociology of education by means of such empirically grounded critique. In this paper radical structuralism, exemplified by the work of Corrigan (1990), is examined with particular concern for its commitment to epistemological relativism and its ambivalent moral politics of choice. Youth Control: Young People and the Politics of Hip Hop Graffiti in Aotearoa/New Zealand Andrew P.
Lynch A number
of youth cultures struggle to negotiate the
of contemporary capitalist
societies, struggles which highlight the vulnerable positions which various
youth identities hold in societies such as Aotearoa. This paper examines
the case of youth who are members of Aotearoa's hip hop graffiti subculture
and explores the various techniques which the state uses both to eradicate
hip hop graffiti texts and to punish and reform the producers of these
texts. The involvement of moral entrepreneurs, the media and city councils,
is discussed to reveal how hip hop graffiti writers are being subjected
to forms of governmentality which are being employed in other social settings. |
||